Garment District Neighbourhood Association
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • DEVELOPMENT
    • Ace Hotel
    • King Portland
    • Manga Hotel
    • Waterworks
    • Woodsworth
    • 445 Adelaide
    • 544 King
    • 149 Bathurst
    • 8-18 Camden
    • 39-47 Camden
    • 580 King
    • 590 King
    • 123 Portland
    • 135 Portland
    • 450 Richmond
    • 457 Richmond
    • 520 Richmond
    • 543 Richmond
    • 96 Spadina
    • Nearby >
      • King Toronto
      • The Well
      • 64-86 Bathurst
      • 164 Bathurst
      • 415 King
      • 663 King
      • 241 Richmond
      • 464 Queen
      • 101 Spadina
      • 147 Spadina
      • 424 Wellington
  • INITIATIVES
    • ONTARIO LINE
    • ST ANDREWS PLAYGROUND
    • YMCA
    • CITY PLANNING
  • RESOURCES
    • LINKS
    • HOW TO
Member Blog Page

King Street Pilot - transit options for King Street

2/23/2017

2 Comments

 
Picture
A King Street Pilot Study Public Meeting was held on February 13th. 
​To access all the slides presented at that meeting, click HERE.
The crux of the meeting was the staging of three creative options designed to achieve these goals:
  • Improve the transit experience
  • Provide safe, comfortable and accessible sidewalks, road crossings and streetcar boarding facilities
  • Transform the public realm experience for pedestrians
  • Reinforce King’s diverse neighbourhood identities

The "Separated Lanes” option dedicates the centre lanes to streetcars, and gives the remaining one lane in each direction to car and truck traffic, forbidding left turns and stopping, but allowing through traffic.
Analysis:
  • Where would delivery/trade/service and taxi/Uber/Wheeltrans/EMS vehicles stop? 
  • Right hand turning vehicles can back up traffic
  • Nearside boarding of streetcars from street level could endanger/challenge passengers
  • Cyclists would share vehicle lanes with cars and trucks 
Picture

The “Alternating Loops” option allows a single lane of one-way car traffic, to facilitate local access to driveways and deliveries, with the direction alternating each block, preventing through traffic. Only right hand turns are permitted with the right hand turn lane isolated from the streetcar lane.  Centre lanes prioritize streetcars but permit moving vehicles to circumvent delivery vehicles.  The fourth lane can be used either as public realm space (option A) or as a dedicated bike lane (option B). Streetcar patrons board from height of curb rather than height of roadway.
Analysis:
  • Streetcars can be blocked by vehicles circumventing stopped or waiting vehicles
  • Cyclists would share lane with cars and trucks (option A) or with boarding streetcar riders (option B)
Picture

The “Transit Promenade” option sees the sidewalk extended into the road on both sides for public realm improvements and accommodation for delivery/trade/service and taxi/Uber/Wheeltrans/EMS vehicles. Moving vehicles share the centre lanes with streetcars except at farside boarding zones they are forced to turn right and prevented from driving straight through intersections
Analysis:
  • Streetcars are given “priority” but how is that possible given that moving vehicles share the same lanes?
  • Cyclists would share public realm space with pedestrians and boarding streetcar riders
  • After making accommodation for stopped or waiting vehicles, how much public realm remains?
Picture
2 Comments
Sylvia
2/23/2017 10:07:49 pm

I prefer the Alternating Loops option with the dedicated bike lane. I think it allows for the most efficient flow of traffic (streetcar, bikes, cars/trucks) while expanding the space for pedestrians. I really like the idea of a dedicated bike lane on King -- perhaps cyclists make up 1% of users of King Street because the current infrastructure is not safe nor conducive for cycling. It also prevents King Street from being used as a thoroughfare which may help to reduce overall congestion. However one consideration is it may result in an increase in vehicle traffic on arterials close to King (such as Wellington, Adelaide, Richmond and Queen).
Separated Lanes would only improve streetcar travel while creating bottlenecking in the curb lane. This option works best for wider streets like Spadina and St. Clair where vehicles have the option to go around traffic stopped in the curb lane.
Transit Promenade would likely improve the amount of sidewalk/pedestrian space but at the cost of forcing streetcars and vehicles to share one lane, resulting in inefficient flow of traffic.

Reply
Ann Marie
2/26/2017 01:01:02 pm

I prefer the 3rd option, although it still requires more thought to work out all the traffic implications. This is the most balanced option in that it offers the best opportunity to evenly distribute green space/soft-scaping with which to maintain a degree of humanity within this corridor. It also is more equitable in how it treats storefront businesses in their access to walk-by traffic (and the commercial viability that comes with it). Increasing sidewalk widths and protective overhands for them, plus maintaining street-tree coverage will be critically important to the future of this street.

If this option is implemented - there needs to be a simultaneously upgrading of the bike lanes on Adelaide and Richmond Sts. to safely syphon-off bike traffic in this area.

Not addressed in any of these options are local solutions for the public storage of visitor bikes/car parking; the absence of which will seriously compromise whichever option is chosen. Have you looked at the Netherlands for solutions to this?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    January 2020
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    August 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Location

Contact Us